Frank wrote:
No problem brother, your 19:9 will be there when you wake up. Lastly, I have never said, nor do I even ponder whether the KJ has errors or not, but, my guess is it is like the NASB it has some. But, all doctines are preserved.

John UK wrote:
My Bible doesn't have marginal notes.
However, the translators said for readers to continue their own investigations regarding certain words, noted in the margin. Thankfully, doctrine is not affected by such minor details.

John UK wrote:
I'd be interested to know what you do when confronted with a marginal note which says, "not in the most ancient mss". Do you still accept it as the word of God, or scratch it out of your NASB with Tippex?

James is back wrote:
Dr White is a Jesuit

Care to provide any credible evidence backed by at least 2 witnesses? Or are you above such biblical requirements?

John UK wrote:
If Neil searches as hard as he can, he will not find me saying yet that shareholders profit from the sick.
However, let me illustrate.
Noel is a hardworking shopkeeper in Ticson, Arizona. He is married with three children who all work in the family business. They live above the shop, frugally but happy, and attend a local church, as they are all Christians.
Over the way, there is another shopkeeper called Mr Wolmart. He too makes sufficient for his needs, selling similar products. But he is not a Christian, and wants more and more.
So he advertises his business, and promises that if people will give him loads of money, he will ensure the safety of that capital, and give every year a huge bonus payment which he calls dividends.
He is successful in his adverts, and soon he has enough money to open ten other shops. He also has the capital to buy at a discount from major suppliers, and so his prices come down and he sells more and more. Profits go up, and the dividends are massive, so people buy more, sitting at home waiting for the divs to roll in.
Noel could not compete and lost his shop, and all the locals missed him terribly. It was a sad ending.

John UK wrote:
Far be it from me not to resolve inconsistencies and continue my Ad Misericoriam soapbox speech and judge things I know little about.
What was the query again?

Neil wrote:

You're inconsistent; if owning pharma shares is wrong (what you ludicrously call profiting from the sick), then why complain about only the rich being able to afford them? If it's wrong for the rich, it's no less wrong for the poor as well.

Contextisitcorrect wrote:
[..The TBS also have a consultant who is just as well instructed in the original languages as brother James White who is in the process of writing a book dealing with some of Dr White's writings on the KJV. Watch this space

Brother James White is a "reformed" Baptist, highly regarded in those circles and prof. D A Carson is too widely known to need recommendation.

John UK wrote:
Tell you what, question, if you love the sinaiticus ms so much, how about translating the Epistle of Barnabas into English and sticking THAT in your modern version, eh?

As for the TR - the so called texts (Beza, Stephanus etc.) do not agree with the KJV and so the TBS have reprinted a supposed text that would underlie the KJV. How brilliant is that?!

You should do some research - the MT is not the same as the TR.

John UK wrote:
You ask the wrong questions

John UK wrote:
And suppose I said that I believed the NIV was the word of God inerrant.
Would you or anyone else come at me and ask why I did not believe the KJV was also God's word, even though it had many texts not found in the NIV?..

John UK wrote:
I do not know it Mike, but I believe it. ....p.s. Mike, without the autographs, nothing about the Bible can be proven...

You maintain, and quite rightly that without the autographs nothing can be proven.

Rothbury News wrote:
Antichrist has already made the claim to be God...read all about it!
'Sitting in the temple of God speaking ex-cathedra the Pope claims to have the infallibility of God Himself. This is the daring pitch and blasphemy of Antichrist in keeping with Paul’s prophecy, ‘Shewing himself to be God.’

The way which Liberalism has embraced many churches today demonstrates this competing heresy which is influential in church and politics. Western society follows Liberalism in its institutions much more than the RCC is followed.

Frank wrote:
So, if a Catholic professes that Christ has come in the flesh, I could listen to what they say about Christ and how they worship Him and I could then conclude they have the spirit of antichrist.

You begin quote "if a Catholic professes that Christ has come in the flesh" - that is the opposite of the sentence used in Scripture, which says "every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh" so your answer has begun with an antithesis. In continuation from this point you have established your rejection of the catholic position. However regardless of the various heresies you perceive practiced within the RCC the original inference of 1John4V3 is not responded to in your post.

John UK wrote:
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist