|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ MARTIN ” |
|
|
| Page 1 | Page 6 · Found: 167 user comments posted recently. |
|  | |  |
|
|
 7/5/13 9:02 AM |
| Martin | | Texas | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
People are shocked by this sort of thing, but what the public needs to understand is that, just as abortionists do not view cutting a newborn child's spine or twisting its head off as murder, because they do not view the child as a human being, I am convinced that many given over to a homosexual lifestyle do not view the "sexualizing" of children with horror in the way that the general public does. We forget how darkened and depraved is the mind of the sexual pervert who justifies his perversion-- many are not governed by societal values AT ALL in their views of the wrongness of 'sexualizing' children. I once knew a homosexual who was the divorced father of two boys. He was living with a homosexual lover at the time, and one day in a conversation with him, he said in passing that when his sons were visiting him, they would all walk around in the nude in the apartment-- the dad, his lover, and the boys. He considered this to be 'normal'-- what could more natural than men and young boys walking around nude together in an apartment?-- that was his attitude. Later, when the oldest son became an adolescent, he 'came out' and declared himself to be gay. Is it any wonder the boy turned out as he did, given his exposure to sexual perversion at such a young age? |
|
|
| 6/18/13 1:54 PM |
| Martin | | Texas | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
It is quite clear that Obama holds to Dr. Peter Singer's view of the value of human life. Dr. Singer denies that human life has any divinely given "sanctity." He wants to replace the idea of the intrinsic "sanctity" of life with a belief that the "quality" of life is what matters. Quality of life determines whether or not a particular human "animal" deserves to live. According to Singer,it is human society, not God, that determines which lives have sufficient quality, and therefore value, to be preserved. For that reason, Singer sees nothing wrong with the practice of infanticide in the case of infants who are born with physical handicaps or mental deficiencies that will greatly reduce their quality of life. He also believes that if a child is unwanted by its mother, its life is thereby denied sufficient value to merit being preserved, so it is perfectly legitimate to eliminate that life either in the womb, or sometime shortly after birth. Such a view is monstrous of course, but that is not surprising, since the denial of God leads to the denial of man as well-- the total obliteration of all divinely given dignity and value to human life. That is apparently the worldview that our president embraces, which explains his advocacy of late-term abortion. |
|
|
| 6/5/13 12:41 PM |
| Martin | | Texas | | | |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Christians can and should celebrate God-ordained diversities that exist by God's design as a part of the created order-- but homosexuality does not fit into that category. As John Jefferson Davis says, "Homosexual behavior, unlike one's race and gender, is not a truly involuntary condition. Unless the homosexual insists on societal acceptance of the public declaration of his or her lifestyle, discrimination need not become an issue." Unfortunately, that is what homosexuals are now seeking, and what so-called "pride" events are designed to promote-- societal acceptance of homosexuality as an involuntary condition. As Christians, we need to "call out" such Satanic lies when we see them, by reminding people that sexual acts between two people of the same sex are no more "involuntary" than prostitution, drug abuse, or child abuse. All of these are sinful and self-destructive acts/lifestyles that a righteous society cannot and should not condone. At the same time, Christians need to love people who are entangled in all these lifestyles by praying for them and calling them to repentance and faith in Christ. |
|
|
| 6/1/13 9:57 AM |
| Martin | | Texas | | | |
|
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
|
Were the government to make a law outlawing criticism of any ideology, the best thing all freedom loving Americans can do is simply ignore the law and keep on speaking the truth in love, as if the law didn't even exist. The temptation, when the government forbids free speech, is to flaunt our freedom by saying the most inflammatory things we can, just to spite the government. As Christians, our speech is to be governed by God alone, not by reaction to ridiculous government mandates. We speak what God commands, not because Obama forbids it, but because God commands it, and we do so in the spirit that God commands-- that is, a spirit of love. The only loving thing to tell Muslims is that their religion cannot save them, but will only delude them and send them to hell, because it leads them to reject Jesus Christ as the only Savior from sin. Only He can give them the free gift of righteousness through faith alone in His Person and work. In turning to Him, they must turn away from every false prophet who denies that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the only Savior-- and that includes the false prophet Mohammed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
