"(1) no, plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to own and use a dairy cow or a diary (sic) herd;
"(2) no, plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to consume the milk from their own cow;
"(3) no, plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to board their cow at the farm of a farmer;
"(4) no, the Zinniker plaintiffs' private contract does not fall outside the scope of the state's police power;
"(5) no, plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to produce and consume the foods of their choice;

Not your pope wrote:
Mr. Yoder:
Yours is the reasoning of the likes of Joseph Smith, founder of the cult of Mormonism.
Whereas, this is a biblical portrait of Protestants and Catholics:
"Pelikan takes a highly sympathetic and even irenic view of Roman Catholicism, seeing the Roman Church as the mother in whose arms the Protestant baby rocks."
Dr. Pelikan correctly understands that Christ has not zero, not many but one Church.

Second, many heathen folks are wise enough to see Protestantism and Romanism as violent cults. Many heathen folks also share my reasoning that murder is wrong. Mormonism, by the way, resembles Rome and is merely part of it, another daughter if you will, not a baby, as with Protestant daughter, who is no baby either. You can throw in the JW's too. All comprise the whore seeking control of the beast, another violent religious system.

DM wrote:
This is about Ian paisley and his Dual God of Masontry and Christianity and His Connection to Bob Jones III and the university even Chuck (Rapist Protector) Phelps.
Be very caeful of men like these because they talk out of both sides of their mouths.
These Men can not serve two masters according to the scriptures and since Ian Paisley has a brother hood with his Orange Masonic Order and since Bob Jones Can't get enough Masons on his board and since Chuck Phelps LOves a man that can rape a girl so much that he would protect and hide him from police, I say they are all together in their demonic brother hood of luficer in their activities.

Elmer Schwartz wrote:
Where's his beard?

Rufus wrote:
Public Schools are the churches for the religion of secular humanism. Assembling in a school would be akin to assembling in a mosque or synagogue.

KyrieEleison1 wrote:
What all Christians should know is that left vs right politics are merely the two heads of the same monster. It is the counter reformation globalists setting up the Hegelian dialectic so that the resulting "compromise" will knock as many Christians as possible off their unchanging foundation into the grey abyss in an attemp to be "reasonable". Its a trick to wash the belief or confidence that one can know right from wrong from the mind; which is the definition of "brainwashing".

Daniel Michael wrote:
Our worship has just been interrupted by "certified mail" today. Kinda a hard to focus on Bible reading now. How many brothers and sisters are undergoing the wrath of these evildoers?

Next week would be a good time since you all will be celebrating Native American Slaughter Day.

Neil wrote:
If you really believe that, then why did you post anything at all? You have nothing to report if you really know nothing.
But actually, you're still claiming to know something – that we (you and I) know nothing! So that is self-refuted.

Do take note of the quotes, though.

Neil wrote:
Dirk, if that's supposed to be a parody, it's poorly devised. And if it's not, then it's merely pathetic.
I didn't ask those question just to bait you. I was hoping for a thoughtful answer, not sarcastic mockery, which is sinful.

Neil wrote:
How do you know? And why is making widgets less "meaningful" than, say, carpentry? How can one lawful vocation be meaningful, & another not?

Do the math: if one sleeps 8 hrs, works 8 hrs, that leaves say 2 hrs for commuting, another hr. for meals, which means one has 5 or so hrs left to read the Bible. Sounds like plenty to me. Not a good reason, I think.

Lawful vocation??