Read the Bible wrote: Baptists delete the verses of the establishment of the Covenant of Grace with Abraham in Genesis 17. The reason they do this is because GOD ordains and demonstrates that the sign and seal of the Covenant is to be administered to babies. And as you know Baptists exclude babies because they cannot speak. The Baptist church does not have babies in its Tradition contrary to God's ordained Word and Covenant law. Christ Jesus is the Mediator of the Covenant of Grace and the Baptists by their Tradition refuse to bring their infants to Jesus. Matt 19:14 But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Concerning Matthew 19:14-------------------------- "To this we give this one word, see that ye read the Word as it is written, and you will find no water in it but the Lord Jesus only. Are the water and Christ the same thing? Is bringing a child to a font bringing the child to Christ? Nay, here is a wide difference, as wide as between false doctrine and the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ". C.H. Spurgeon
Pathophysiology of Male Homosexuality -- Rated "M!" Is a good enough reason for having such laws on the books. While usually I don't think that moral statements from secular sources is very practical, and in this case, it is it either, I still apply there actions for highlighting such a grossly unnatural act.
Perfect timing on this guys quote, it coincided nicely with a few passages i read earlier! proverbs 16:18 & Jeremiah 49:16
Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.
Thy terribleness (prestige) hath deceived thee, and the pride of thine heart, O thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, that holdest the height of the hill: though thou shouldest make thy nest as high as tge eagle, I will bring thee down from thence, saith the LORD.
has found according to the flesh? 2Â For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not toward God. 3Â For what does the Scripture say? âAbraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.â 4Â Now to him who works, the reward is not counted as grace, but as something owed. 5Â But to him who doesnât work, but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is account ex for righteousness. 6Â Even as David also pronounces blessing on the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works,
Mr Bloomberg like anyone else who isn't a Christian will not go to heaven. Even Jews who do not believe in Christ are condemned and not saved by their works Romans 4
R. K. Borill wrote: In any case, regardless of whether or not Easter is the proper name for this particular Sunday begs the question. The real issue is this particular Sunday is elevated above every Sabbath which is The Lord's Day. This is done in connection with the RCC calendar just as the harlot puts all her "holidays" above the Sabbath,
In any case, regardless of whether or not Easter is the proper name for this particular Sunday begs the question. The real issue is this particular Sunday is elevated above every Sabbath which is The Lord's Day. This is done in connection with the RCC calendar just as the harlot puts all her "holidays" above the Sabbath,
Great Sermon! Praise the LORD that He used this sermon to grant me understanding of this passage, one I wrestled with many times in the past. (Thinking covering was correct but unable to reconcile all the verses in the passage, so not covering my hair due to my uncertainty). Now that I understand it will be easy to explain my headcovering to others. What cinched it: God's glory, not mine. That is such a clear overaching Biblical truth, always embraced, it makes perfect sense now...but I had never made the connection between my hair and God's glory. The practical examples of how we women treat our hair was so telling in that regard. Well done! Thank you! May the Lord Jesus be glorified in you to His everlasting praise and your joy in Him.