You are already singing the "I am smart, you are stupid" song. Did not take you too long.

Funny, I have not quoted anyone and you claim that I take advice from false teachers. And you take advice from saints, right. It's that what you are getting at?

"Here's a good start..."
Now hold on horsey, you are already trying to go from subject to subject without answering anything. You asked for an example of lie and I shared one with you. Instead of redeeming yourself, you resort to the "ignorance" strawman but you answered nothing. Now you want to ignore the devastating truth altogether and go to your pet kool-aid driven subjects.

You are going to have to do better than that if you are going to strut over here claiming to be smarter than everyone else simply because you affirm that your great grandad was a flee-infested monkey.

So I do not understand how you see a contradiction with \\\"separation\\\" being a valid definition of death. In contrast the doctrine of reconciliation is of supreme importance in fully understanding the meaning of death in the Bible. That\\\'s why when one is separated (or banished) from society, it is called Civil death.
Physical death= separation of body from the soul.
Spiritual death= separation of man from God.
Second death= Separation of man from God eternally.
Dead to Sin= Separation of Christians from sin.

And yes, I have you down. I know you better than you know yourself. So if you\\\'d like to stick around, I will be more than happy to educate you about yourself.
________________________________________

Before I start allow me to make a clarification before you start off with a smokescreen technacalities which is no technacality at all. When I say monkey, I mean as everyone else here mean as well an ape-like creature. It reffers to any of the long line of decendents after the break in ancestry from the chimpanzee (as you would hilariously describe it). So don\\\'t get hung up on it to try to divert from the point made.

\\\"As for observing something that takes millions of years- That\\\'s hilarious\\\"

Yes, I find it hilarious myself. That\\\'s why I am not an evolutionist.

\\\"If we saw something like a fish turning into a frog in just a couple generations, we would have good evidence against evolution.\\\"

We had 40 plus translators of which anyone of them can outdo any of the translators today. And considering the fact that hey took great care in their translation process, and risked their lives in doing so, I would take their word against anyone here.

How about for starters the statement that we evolved from monkeys (or as you would preffer as if it makes the picture look any brighter--- apelike creature) when noone has ever observed such a spectacle and would not be able to if they wanted to.

I think that\'s a good start.

It's hard to change once you have been indoctrinated in one perspective, especially if there are a lot of good men that you admire that hold to the same view. It's a problem that all of us have.

I believe that Ruckmanism is a dangerous doctrine to the church, but I rather be Ruckmanite than a progressive who thinks he has the liberty to change the Word of God. One extreme always breeds its opposite. This serves to warn us and to show us of how finite we are as human beings.

Actually, that was not me. Even if it were there was one that was 30 minutes in between the post. That hardly can be called a consecutive post. The next one was Berean, which he just happen to make a snear comment right when I needed it.

So the only thing adolescent and reprehensible is you believing everything you here from your Calv friends and you allowing them to post under under multiple alliances and yet you are quick to pull the plug on me everytime the Calvs cry foul play.

Babies? Yes. I think the mature thing is to stop trying to play dad (and on top of that play favorites) and allow the truth to work itself out.

"So you got to the point by appropriating my moniker and posted an answer that I have repeatedly rejected as unbiblical so everyone could move on? Oh, I see."

And let me guess, every encyclopedia in the world has conspired with Satan to rewrite history.

1. How about starting by telling God that you do not have it. You would never know that David was backsliding in heart by reading Psalm 119. You would think he was at his spiritual high but the last verse states:

\"I have gone astray like a lost sheep: seek thy servant;for I do not forget thy commandments.\"

2. I find that a good spirtual fast also helps to generate that hunger once again. It is a good spirtual excercise where one says no to the flesh and yes to the spirit.

Isaiah 58
6Is not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke?.... 8Then shall thy light break forth as the morning, and thine health shall spring forth speedily: and thy righteousness shall go before thee; the glory of the LORD shall be thy rearward.\"

3. Contemplate the day that Jesus saved you. I find that the way to keep my marriage fresh is to daydream about my courting days with my wife. Since marriage is only but a reflection of our relationship with God, imagine if we do the same with our relationship with God.

What we lack is hunger. Hunger for God. For his truth. I believe that we as Christians are being filled with Hollywood that takes away from our apetite. If others only knew what we allowed to enter the eyegates when noone is around. We would all be ashamed. The junkfood of the the world always robs us from the spiritual apetitite that we should have.

I believe revival starts when one becomes sick of who he is towards God and becomes consumed with the love God has for him.

Well, you know what they say. One man\\\'s trash is another man\\\'s treasure.

"I have been trying to get Yamil and other Arminian free willers, to accept precisely this and stop them trying to introduce the sinners "cooperation" unto salvation. But oh its an uphill climb!!!"

Ha! (1)Try using the Bible without fabricating definitions that do not exist anywhere except in the F_anciful L_and of the Calvinist ; (2) Consider the context instead of isolating versus for your own theological bias and (3)accept the simple declarative statements of scripture.