http://www.examcollection.us/C9020-461-vce.html Very interesting blog. A lot of blogs I see these days don't really provide anything that I'm interested in, but I'm most definitely interested in this one. Just thought that I would post and let you know about http://www.examcollection.us/C9020-970-vce.html
I DO apologize to Officer Barney Fife! I'm sure he knows the Constitution better than the impostor from Kenya and there's no doubt Barney is loyal to it and America! The same can't be said for the lying criminal in the White House! All he seems to know is how to promote every abomination God hates!!!
Article II of the Constitution requires that an agreement such as this is to be submitted to the Senate for its advice and consent â€“â€“â€“
Obama has proven over and over again that he is the biggest south end of a northbound horse on this planet â€“â€“â€“ this climate control proposal will cost taxpayers BILLIONS of dollars â€“â€“â€“ just more of Obama's green energy hoodoo ... he (and many others like him) are well-versed in spending money we don't have â€“â€“â€“â€“ Rather than waste all that money on this foolish "pipe dream" THEY SHOULD JUST PILE ALL THE MONEY UP AND LIGHT IT ON FIRE â€“â€“ at least it will go to some use as a source of heat rather than letting Obama further squander the wealth of America spreading it around to othersâ€¦
You can bet this, just like Obama care, will impact all Americans that are on the poverty line, the middle class and everyone in-between â€“â€“â€“ Par for the course when dealing with the Democratic Party and their grand comrade Barack Hussein Obama
I honestly believe they will block it â€“â€“ and if they don't hopefully it will be overturned :-)
Our careless representatives in Washington, DC best get a grip and start putting America/Americans FIRST!!!!!!!
James Thomas wrote: Isaiah 54:13 (KJV) 13 And all thy children shall be taught of the LORD; and great shall be the peace of thy children. God teaches some? No. ALL! Zephaniah 3:9 9 For then will I turn to the people a pure language, that they may all call upon the name of the LORD, to serve him with one consent. Is the Bible in your pure language of English? 1536 The NT was given. In 1560 The Geneva Bible OT and NT was given.
Taking tradition out, Isaiah 54:13, Jeremiah 24:7 and Zephaniah 3:9 are talking about the people of Israel in the future.
â€śFor a mere moment I have forsaken you, But with great mercies I will gather you. Isaiah 54:7 NKJV
For I will set My eyes on them for good, and I will bring them back to this land; I will build them and not pull them down, and I will plant them and not pluck them up. Then I will give them a heart to know Me, that I am the Lord ; and they shall be My people, and I will be their God, for they shall return to Me with their whole heart. Jeremiah 24:6â€-â€¬7 NKJV
Sounds like Israel to me.
I can't really say that English is any purer of a language than Spanish, French, Russian, or Chinese, etc. I believe Zeph 3:9 is talking about Hebrew.
This is like an atheist creating a list to tell other atheists not to send their children to Baptist schools. What's the point, the worldviews are not compatible.
If you don't like the college, then don't go to it, easy simple, they are discriminating against the convictions of the colleges, the Bible warned us there would be scoffers walking after their own lusts, and that the church would be hated of all men for the name of Christ.
Their whole reasoning is, "You don't accept this lifestyle, therefore you're a terrible college" These queers need to stop going after Southern Baptist Colleges and be involved in kicking out the Ku Klux Klan, or putting an end to abortion, now that's a more sensible cause.
From the article: The Social Justice Living-Learning Community is â€śdesigned for students who are involved in promoting a more inclusive and just society"
They're inclusive all right. As long as you agree with their point of view. Disagree with one of these pampered social justice warriors and they'll either go on a vicious tirade or retreat to their safe space.
Though there is infant baptism mentioned in the article I used a better one would be,
John MacArthur said or, wrote: Iâ€™m going to give you five reasons why we must reject infant baptism, five reasons. Hereâ€™s the first one and this would be enough, infant baptism is not in the Scripture. Infant baptism is not in the Scripture. Scripture nowhere advocates or records any such thing as the baptism of an infant. It is therefore impossible to support infant baptism from the Bible. It is not in the Bible. Thereâ€™s not an incident of it, thereâ€™s not a mandate, thereâ€™s not a call for it, thereâ€™s not a description of it. It doesnâ€™t appear. In fact, if you go back in history, and Iâ€™m going to do that a little bit with you, you will find that historians have affirmed this fact. Theological leaders in generations past have affirmed this truth.
Observer wrote: 1) 11 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth
2) John 10 26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. 27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: They had to be his sheep before they could hear!
1) So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy. Romans 9:16 NASB
Two examples are given. One shows man trying to fulfill God's promise according to works (Abraham having a child with Hagar) and the other shows man wanting someone to be a child of promise (Isaac wanted his 1st born, Esau, to receive his inheritance and blessings). God didn't choose either one so that it would not depend on the man who wills (Isaac) or the man who runs (Abraham), but on God who has mercy.
2) That doesn't mean they didn't hear God.
They believed in the Father. These were believers in God who were converting to Christ.
No, Barrack Hussain Obama is a clever war criminal. He kicks the soccer ball of how to change the subject because since 2009, over 200,000 Syrians have been slaughtered by Assad , Putin, and the ayatollahs of Iran. A continued pattern of terrorism through out Europe and the US. In addition to 400,000 illegal aliens permitted to cross the southern border, 95 million out of worker, not to mention 20 trillion in debt. And a pending bankruptcy of Obama care by 2017. Police shootings encouraged by embracing BLM and the BP. His social engineering of queer marriage and executive orders for trannys and other perverts waiting to attack your wife and children. This president has failed. The cackling Clinton has not been in days, I seriously believe if Trump has one month of sanity and not the orange clown act, he could win.
You ladies and gentlemen should really look over the Dr. Vlach's New Covenant Theology Compared with Covenantalism. I think he did an excellent job of explaining New Covenant Theology as compared to Old Covenant Theology, Mike really turned a phrase, "In sum, New Covenant Theology is correct in not accepting the covenants of Covenant Theology. Ockhamâ€™s Razor may apply to this issue, which is, â€śDonâ€™t multiply hypotheses needlessly.â€ť In this case Covenant Theology has cluttered Godâ€™s plan with covenants that can only be found in the white spaces of scripture." It's probably a fairly short explanation of both positions of these groups, with New Covenant folks a lot closer to the Bible. One glaring example is the nonsense of infant baptism, a holdover from Catholicism that even Luther didn't get rid of, q.v., Martin Luther's Sacramental Gospel